Add comprehensive game design decisions documentation with rationale and alternatives
This commit is contained in:
459
documentation/game-design-decisions.md
Normal file
459
documentation/game-design-decisions.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,459 @@
|
|||||||
|
# Game Design Decisions - Neural Nexus
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
This document records all major design decisions made during development, including the rationale behind each choice and alternatives considered.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Table of Contents
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
1. [Core Concept Decisions](#core-concept-decisions)
|
||||||
|
2. [Visual Design Decisions](#visual-design-decisions)
|
||||||
|
3. [Gameplay Mechanics Decisions](#gameplay-mechanics-decisions)
|
||||||
|
4. [Technical Architecture Decisions](#technical-architecture-decisions)
|
||||||
|
5. [User Experience Decisions](#user-experience-decisions)
|
||||||
|
6. [Performance Decisions](#performance-decisions)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Core Concept Decisions
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Decision 1: Neural Network Theme
|
||||||
|
**Date:** June 2025
|
||||||
|
**Decision:** Build a puzzle game around neural network connectivity patterns
|
||||||
|
**Rationale:**
|
||||||
|
- **Contemporary Relevance:** AI and neural networks are highly topical and engaging
|
||||||
|
- **Visual Appeal:** Network patterns provide rich visual possibilities
|
||||||
|
- **Educational Value:** Introduces players to AI concepts in accessible way
|
||||||
|
- **Differentiation:** Unique theme in puzzle game market
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Alternatives Considered:**
|
||||||
|
- Traditional electrical circuits (too technical)
|
||||||
|
- Social network connections (overused theme)
|
||||||
|
- Abstract geometric patterns (lacks narrative hook)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Impact:** Defines all visual design, mechanics, and marketing messaging
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Decision 2: Puzzle Game Genre
|
||||||
|
**Date:** June 2025
|
||||||
|
**Decision:** Focus on connection-based puzzle mechanics rather than action or strategy
|
||||||
|
**Rationale:**
|
||||||
|
- **Accessibility:** Easy to learn, hard to master appeals to broad audience
|
||||||
|
- **Performance:** Puzzle games can achieve 60fps more easily than action games
|
||||||
|
- **Development Scope:** Manageable for single developer
|
||||||
|
- **Replay Value:** Procedural level generation provides infinite content
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Alternatives Considered:**
|
||||||
|
- Real-time strategy with neural networks (too complex)
|
||||||
|
- Action game with network building (performance concerns)
|
||||||
|
- Educational simulation (limited audience appeal)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Impact:** Shapes all gameplay systems and difficulty progression
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Visual Design Decisions
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Decision 3: Glassmorphism UI Style
|
||||||
|
**Date:** June 2025
|
||||||
|
**Decision:** Use modern glassmorphism design with blur effects and transparency
|
||||||
|
**Rationale:**
|
||||||
|
- **Contemporary Feel:** Aligns with current design trends
|
||||||
|
- **Neural Theme:** Glass/transparency suggests data flow and connectivity
|
||||||
|
- **Depth:** Creates visual hierarchy without overwhelming gameplay
|
||||||
|
- **Premium Feel:** Elevates game above basic web games
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Alternatives Considered:**
|
||||||
|
- Flat material design (too generic)
|
||||||
|
- Skeuomorphic style (outdated, performance heavy)
|
||||||
|
- Minimalist approach (lacks visual appeal)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Technical Implementation:**
|
||||||
|
```css
|
||||||
|
.game-element {
|
||||||
|
background: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.3);
|
||||||
|
backdrop-filter: blur(10px);
|
||||||
|
border: 1px solid rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.1);
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Impact:** Defines entire visual language and CSS architecture
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Decision 4: Color Palette
|
||||||
|
**Date:** June 2025
|
||||||
|
**Decision:** Cyan (#00d4ff) and magenta (#ff00ff) as primary colors with dark background
|
||||||
|
**Rationale:**
|
||||||
|
- **High Contrast:** Excellent visibility for gameplay elements
|
||||||
|
- **Tech Aesthetic:** Evokes computer/digital themes
|
||||||
|
- **Accessibility:** Colors remain distinguishable for colorblind users
|
||||||
|
- **Energy:** Vibrant palette creates engaging atmosphere
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Color System:**
|
||||||
|
```css
|
||||||
|
:root {
|
||||||
|
--neural-cyan: #00d4ff; /* Primary brand, connections */
|
||||||
|
--neural-magenta: #ff00ff; /* Secondary brand, effects */
|
||||||
|
--source-green: #00ff64; /* Source nodes */
|
||||||
|
--target-orange: #ff6400; /* Target nodes */
|
||||||
|
--background-dark: #0a0a0a; /* Deep background */
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Alternatives Considered:**
|
||||||
|
- Blue/green scheme (less energetic)
|
||||||
|
- Monochromatic approach (less visual interest)
|
||||||
|
- Warm color palette (doesn't match tech theme)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Impact:** Affects all visual elements and particle effects
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Decision 5: Particle Effects System
|
||||||
|
**Date:** June 2025
|
||||||
|
**Decision:** Use DOM-based particles with CSS animations for connection feedback
|
||||||
|
**Rationale:**
|
||||||
|
- **Performance:** CSS animations are hardware accelerated
|
||||||
|
- **Simplicity:** Easier to implement than Canvas-based particles
|
||||||
|
- **Flexibility:** Easy to modify colors and timing
|
||||||
|
- **Browser Support:** Works across all target browsers
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Implementation Pattern:**
|
||||||
|
```javascript
|
||||||
|
function createParticleEffect(x, y) {
|
||||||
|
for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
|
||||||
|
const particle = document.createElement('div');
|
||||||
|
particle.className = 'particle';
|
||||||
|
// CSS handles animation and cleanup
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Alternatives Considered:**
|
||||||
|
- Canvas-based particles (more complex, potential performance issues)
|
||||||
|
- WebGL effects (overkill for simple feedback)
|
||||||
|
- No particles (lacks satisfying feedback)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Impact:** Enhances user feedback and visual polish
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Gameplay Mechanics Decisions
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Decision 6: Click-and-Drag Connection System
|
||||||
|
**Date:** June 2025
|
||||||
|
**Decision:** Players connect nodes by dragging from one to another
|
||||||
|
**Rationale:**
|
||||||
|
- **Intuitive:** Natural gesture that users understand immediately
|
||||||
|
- **Cross-Platform:** Works identically on mouse and touch devices
|
||||||
|
- **Precise:** Allows deliberate connection choices
|
||||||
|
- **Satisfying:** Physical drag motion feels rewarding
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Interaction Flow:**
|
||||||
|
1. Mouse/touch down on source node
|
||||||
|
2. Drag with visual preview line
|
||||||
|
3. Release on target node to create connection
|
||||||
|
4. Visual and particle feedback on success
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Alternatives Considered:**
|
||||||
|
- Click-to-select, click-to-connect (less intuitive)
|
||||||
|
- Keyboard-based selection (poor accessibility)
|
||||||
|
- Hover-based connections (accidental triggers)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Impact:** Defines core interaction model and input handling
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Decision 7: Progressive Difficulty Scaling
|
||||||
|
**Date:** June 2025
|
||||||
|
**Decision:** Gradually increase nodes and connections while decreasing time
|
||||||
|
**Rationale:**
|
||||||
|
- **Learning Curve:** Allows skill development without frustration
|
||||||
|
- **Engagement:** Maintains challenge as players improve
|
||||||
|
- **Retention:** Players feel progression and accomplishment
|
||||||
|
- **Flexibility:** Algorithm can be tuned based on player data
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Scaling Formula:**
|
||||||
|
```javascript
|
||||||
|
const nodeCount = Math.min(5 + Math.floor(level * 0.7), 12);
|
||||||
|
const timeLimit = Math.max(45, 60 - Math.floor(level / 3) * 2);
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Alternatives Considered:**
|
||||||
|
- Fixed difficulty levels (less engaging progression)
|
||||||
|
- Player-selected difficulty (analysis paralysis)
|
||||||
|
- Adaptive difficulty based on performance (too complex)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Impact:** Shapes long-term player experience and retention
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Decision 8: Pattern-Matching Victory Condition
|
||||||
|
**Date:** June 2025
|
||||||
|
**Decision:** Players must recreate exact dotted pattern shown on screen
|
||||||
|
**Rationale:**
|
||||||
|
- **Clear Objective:** No ambiguity about goals
|
||||||
|
- **Visual Guidance:** Dotted lines provide clear instruction
|
||||||
|
- **Scalable Complexity:** Patterns can become arbitrarily complex
|
||||||
|
- **Immediate Feedback:** Players know progress toward completion
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Victory Detection:**
|
||||||
|
```javascript
|
||||||
|
function checkLevelComplete() {
|
||||||
|
const madeConnections = gameState.connections.map(/* normalize */);
|
||||||
|
const targetConnections = gameState.targetPattern.map(/* normalize */);
|
||||||
|
return targetConnections.every(target =>
|
||||||
|
madeConnections.some(made => arraysEqual(made, target))
|
||||||
|
);
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Alternatives Considered:**
|
||||||
|
- Minimum spanning tree (too mathematical)
|
||||||
|
- Creative/artistic freedom (no clear victory state)
|
||||||
|
- Score-based completion (less satisfying)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Impact:** Defines level generation and completion logic
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Technical Architecture Decisions
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Decision 9: Vanilla JavaScript Implementation
|
||||||
|
**Date:** June 2025
|
||||||
|
**Decision:** Build with vanilla HTML5/JavaScript without external frameworks
|
||||||
|
**Rationale:**
|
||||||
|
- **Performance:** No framework overhead, maximum control
|
||||||
|
- **Simplicity:** No build process, immediate deployment
|
||||||
|
- **Learning:** Deeper understanding of web technologies
|
||||||
|
- **Maintenance:** No framework dependency updates or breaking changes
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Architecture Pattern:**
|
||||||
|
```javascript
|
||||||
|
// Single global state object
|
||||||
|
let gameState = { /* all game data */ };
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
// Class-based entities
|
||||||
|
class Node { /* node behavior */ }
|
||||||
|
class Connection { /* connection behavior */ }
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
// Functional game logic
|
||||||
|
function gameLoop() { /* main update cycle */ }
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Alternatives Considered:**
|
||||||
|
- React (unnecessary complexity for game)
|
||||||
|
- Vue.js (simpler but still overhead)
|
||||||
|
- Game frameworks (Phaser.js - too heavy for simple puzzle)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Impact:** Affects all code organization and deployment strategy
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Decision 10: Canvas 2D Rendering
|
||||||
|
**Date:** June 2025
|
||||||
|
**Decision:** Use HTML5 Canvas 2D API for game graphics
|
||||||
|
**Rationale:**
|
||||||
|
- **Performance:** Direct pixel control, smooth 60fps achievable
|
||||||
|
- **Flexibility:** Complete control over rendering pipeline
|
||||||
|
- **Browser Support:** Excellent compatibility across devices
|
||||||
|
- **Features:** Sufficient for 2D graphics needs
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Rendering Loop:**
|
||||||
|
```javascript
|
||||||
|
function gameLoop() {
|
||||||
|
// Clear canvas
|
||||||
|
ctx.clearRect(0, 0, canvas.width, canvas.height);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
// Draw game elements
|
||||||
|
drawTargetPattern();
|
||||||
|
gameState.connections.forEach(conn => conn.draw());
|
||||||
|
gameState.nodes.forEach(node => node.draw());
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
requestAnimationFrame(gameLoop);
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Alternatives Considered:**
|
||||||
|
- WebGL (overkill for 2D puzzle game)
|
||||||
|
- DOM manipulation (performance limitations)
|
||||||
|
- SVG graphics (harder to animate smoothly)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Impact:** Determines rendering performance and visual capabilities
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Decision 11: Client-Side Only Architecture
|
||||||
|
**Date:** June 2025
|
||||||
|
**Decision:** Build as purely client-side application with no backend
|
||||||
|
**Rationale:**
|
||||||
|
- **Simplicity:** No server setup, maintenance, or costs
|
||||||
|
- **Privacy:** No user data collection or storage
|
||||||
|
- **Performance:** No network latency for gameplay
|
||||||
|
- **Deployment:** Static hosting is simple and reliable
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Data Storage:**
|
||||||
|
- Game state: In-memory during session
|
||||||
|
- Settings: localStorage (future feature)
|
||||||
|
- Scores: localStorage (future feature)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Alternatives Considered:**
|
||||||
|
- Backend with user accounts (unnecessary complexity)
|
||||||
|
- Cloud save synchronization (premature optimization)
|
||||||
|
- Multiplayer features (future consideration)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Impact:** Simplifies deployment and maintenance significantly
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## User Experience Decisions
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Decision 12: Mobile-First Responsive Design
|
||||||
|
**Date:** June 2025
|
||||||
|
**Decision:** Design primarily for mobile devices, enhance for desktop
|
||||||
|
**Rationale:**
|
||||||
|
- **Usage Patterns:** Puzzle games popular on mobile devices
|
||||||
|
- **Touch Optimization:** Ensures excellent mobile experience
|
||||||
|
- **Accessibility:** Larger touch targets benefit all users
|
||||||
|
- **Market Reach:** Mobile-first approach captures broader audience
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Implementation:**
|
||||||
|
```css
|
||||||
|
/* Mobile-first base styles */
|
||||||
|
.game-element {
|
||||||
|
padding: 12px; /* Minimum 44px touch targets */
|
||||||
|
font-size: 1.2rem;
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
/* Desktop enhancements */
|
||||||
|
@media (min-width: 768px) {
|
||||||
|
.game-element {
|
||||||
|
padding: 8px;
|
||||||
|
font-size: 1rem;
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Alternatives Considered:**
|
||||||
|
- Desktop-first design (poor mobile experience)
|
||||||
|
- Separate mobile version (maintenance overhead)
|
||||||
|
- Mobile-only approach (limits audience)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Impact:** Influences all UI design and interaction patterns
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Decision 13: Minimal Onboarding
|
||||||
|
**Date:** June 2025
|
||||||
|
**Decision:** Teach through gameplay rather than explicit tutorials
|
||||||
|
**Rationale:**
|
||||||
|
- **Immediacy:** Players start playing immediately
|
||||||
|
- **Discovery:** Learning through exploration is more engaging
|
||||||
|
- **Simplicity:** Core mechanics are intuitive enough
|
||||||
|
- **Accessibility:** Works for users who skip tutorials
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Onboarding Elements:**
|
||||||
|
- Clear visual instructions in welcome screen
|
||||||
|
- Dotted line patterns provide implicit guidance
|
||||||
|
- Simple early levels teach mechanics naturally
|
||||||
|
- Immediate feedback reinforces correct actions
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Alternatives Considered:**
|
||||||
|
- Step-by-step tutorial (interrupts flow)
|
||||||
|
- Video introduction (loading overhead)
|
||||||
|
- Practice mode (unnecessary complexity)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Impact:** Affects first-time user experience and retention
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Performance Decisions
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Decision 14: 60fps Target on Desktop
|
||||||
|
**Date:** June 2025
|
||||||
|
**Decision:** Optimize for consistent 60fps on mid-range desktop hardware
|
||||||
|
**Rationale:**
|
||||||
|
- **User Experience:** Smooth animations feel premium
|
||||||
|
- **Competitive Advantage:** Many web games neglect performance
|
||||||
|
- **Technical Excellence:** Demonstrates development skill
|
||||||
|
- **Accessibility:** Works well on older hardware
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Optimization Strategies:**
|
||||||
|
- Efficient Canvas clearing and drawing
|
||||||
|
- Throttled event handlers (mousemove, touchmove)
|
||||||
|
- Object pooling for particles
|
||||||
|
- Minimal DOM manipulation during gameplay
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Performance Budget:**
|
||||||
|
- Frame time: <16.67ms (60fps)
|
||||||
|
- Memory usage: <100MB desktop, <50MB mobile
|
||||||
|
- Load time: <3 seconds on 3G connection
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Alternatives Considered:**
|
||||||
|
- 30fps target (less smooth experience)
|
||||||
|
- Variable framerate (inconsistent feel)
|
||||||
|
- No performance optimization (poor user experience)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Impact:** Influences all technical implementation decisions
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Decision 15: Graceful Degradation Strategy
|
||||||
|
**Date:** June 2025
|
||||||
|
**Decision:** Maintain core functionality on older devices with reduced effects
|
||||||
|
**Rationale:**
|
||||||
|
- **Accessibility:** Includes users with older hardware
|
||||||
|
- **Market Reach:** Broader device compatibility
|
||||||
|
- **Reliability:** Consistent experience across platforms
|
||||||
|
- **Future-Proofing:** Won't break on edge cases
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Degradation Hierarchy:**
|
||||||
|
1. Core gameplay (always preserved)
|
||||||
|
2. UI responsiveness (maintained on all devices)
|
||||||
|
3. Particle effects (reduced on slow devices)
|
||||||
|
4. Visual effects (simplified if needed)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Implementation:**
|
||||||
|
```javascript
|
||||||
|
// Performance-based feature toggling
|
||||||
|
if (averageFrameTime > 20) {
|
||||||
|
// Reduce particle count
|
||||||
|
particleSystem.maxParticles = Math.floor(particleSystem.maxParticles * 0.5);
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Alternatives Considered:**
|
||||||
|
- High-end only optimization (excludes users)
|
||||||
|
- No degradation (breaks on slow devices)
|
||||||
|
- Multiple versions (maintenance overhead)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Impact:** Ensures broad accessibility and device support
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Decision Review Process
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Monthly Review Schedule
|
||||||
|
Each month, review all documented decisions for:
|
||||||
|
- **Continued Relevance:** Do decisions still make sense?
|
||||||
|
- **Performance Impact:** Are decisions achieving intended goals?
|
||||||
|
- **User Feedback:** Do decisions align with actual user behavior?
|
||||||
|
- **Technical Evolution:** Have new technologies made decisions obsolete?
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Decision Update Process
|
||||||
|
When updating decisions:
|
||||||
|
1. Document what changed and why
|
||||||
|
2. Note impact on existing implementation
|
||||||
|
3. Plan migration strategy if needed
|
||||||
|
4. Update related documentation
|
||||||
|
5. Communicate changes to stakeholders
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Success Metrics
|
||||||
|
- **User Satisfaction:** Positive feedback on design choices
|
||||||
|
- **Performance Goals:** Meeting established benchmarks
|
||||||
|
- **Development Velocity:** Decisions support rather than hinder progress
|
||||||
|
- **Technical Debt:** Decisions age well without major refactoring
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Last Updated:** June 2025
|
||||||
|
**Next Review:** July 2025
|
||||||
|
**Document Owner:** Development Team
|
||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user