diff --git a/knowledge-base/development/decision-history.md b/knowledge-base/development/decision-history.md
index b1832a4..97a632a 100644
--- a/knowledge-base/development/decision-history.md
+++ b/knowledge-base/development/decision-history.md
@@ -1,288 +1,276 @@
-# Decision History Log
+# Development Decision History - Neural Nexus
 
-## Project Foundation Decisions
+This document tracks all major development decisions made during the project lifecycle, providing context for future reference and team knowledge transfer.
 
-### Technology Stack Selection
-**Date**: June 13, 2025  
-**Decision**: Use Vanilla HTML5/JavaScript instead of frameworks  
-**Rationale**: 
-- Maximum performance with minimal overhead
-- No build system complexity for prototype stage
-- Educational value in understanding core web technologies
-- Easier deployment and debugging
-- Future framework migration possible if needed
+## Decision Log Format
 
-**Alternatives Considered**: React, Vue.js, Svelte  
-**Trade-offs Accepted**: More manual DOM management, less component reusability  
-**Status**: ✅ Confirmed working well
+Each entry includes:
+- **Date**: When the decision was made
+- **Context**: Situation that required the decision
+- **Decision**: What was chosen
+- **Rationale**: Why this choice was made
+- **Alternatives**: Other options considered
+- **Impact**: Effects on development and architecture
+- **Status**: Current, Modified, or Superseded
 
-### Graphics Technology Choice
-**Date**: June 13, 2025  
-**Decision**: Canvas 2D API for game rendering  
-**Rationale**:
-- Excellent performance for 2D graphics
-- Wide browser compatibility
-- Precise control over rendering pipeline
-- Suitable for particle effects and animations
-- Simpler than WebGL for current scope
+## June 2025 Decisions
 
-**Alternatives Considered**: WebGL, SVG, DOM manipulation  
-**Trade-offs Accepted**: Limited 3D capabilities, manual optimization needed  
-**Status**: ✅ Excellent performance achieved
+### Decision 001: Single-File Game Architecture
+**Date:** June 13, 2025  
+**Context:** Choosing development approach for HTML5 game  
+**Decision:** Build complete game in single index.html file  
+**Rationale:**
+- Simplifies deployment (no build process)
+- Easier for contributors to understand
+- Immediate testing and iteration
+- Perfect for GitHub Pages hosting
 
-### Single-File Architecture
-**Date**: June 13, 2025  
-**Decision**: Keep entire game in single `index.html` file  
-**Rationale**:
-- Instant deployment to any static host
-- No build process required
-- Easy to share and debug
-- Suitable for prototype/early development
-- Can be refactored later if needed
+**Alternatives Considered:**
+- Multi-file structure with build process
+- Framework-based architecture (React, Vue)
+- Game engine approach (Phaser.js)
 
-**Alternatives Considered**: Modular file structure, bundler setup  
-**Trade-offs Accepted**: Harder to maintain as codebase grows  
-**Status**: ✅ Working well for current scope, monitor for refactoring needs
-
-## Game Design Decisions
-
-### Neural Network Theme
-**Date**: June 13, 2025  
-**Decision**: Neural network connectivity as core theme  
-**Rationale**:
-- Contemporary and relevant to current AI trends
-- Visually appealing with glowing nodes and connections
-- Natural fit for puzzle mechanics
-- Educational value about networks and connectivity
-- Distinctive in puzzle game market
-
-**Alternatives Considered**: Circuit boards, constellation patterns, molecule structures  
-**Trade-offs Accepted**: Theme might become dated, technical complexity in explanation  
-**Status**: ✅ Positive player feedback on theme
-
-### Time-Based Challenges
-**Date**: June 13, 2025  
-**Decision**: Include timer-based pressure in gameplay  
-**Rationale**:
-- Creates urgency and excitement
-- Encourages replay for better scores
-- Natural difficulty progression (decreasing time limits)
-- Prevents analysis paralysis
-- Standard in successful puzzle games
-
-**Alternatives Considered**: Move-limited puzzles, no time pressure  
-**Trade-offs Accepted**: May stress some players, could alienate casual audience  
-**Status**: ✅ Balancing seems appropriate, monitor feedback
-
-### Progressive Difficulty Scaling
-**Date**: June 13, 2025  
-**Decision**: Gradual increase in nodes and connections per level  
-**Rationale**:
-- Maintains player engagement without overwhelming
-- Natural learning curve
-- Allows pattern recognition skills to develop
-- Industry standard for puzzle games
-- Accommodates different skill levels
-
-**Alternatives Considered**: Fixed difficulty, random difficulty spikes  
-**Trade-offs Accepted**: May become predictable, skilled players might get bored  
-**Status**: ✅ Working well, consider adding difficulty options later
-
-## Visual Design Decisions
-
-### Glassmorphism UI Style
-**Date**: June 13, 2025  
-**Decision**: Modern glassmorphism design with blur effects  
-**Rationale**:
-- Contemporary and visually appealing
-- Creates depth and sophistication
-- Works well with neural network theme
-- Distinctive from traditional game UIs
-- Trending in modern web design
-
-**Alternatives Considered**: Flat design, skeuomorphic, neon cyberpunk  
-**Trade-offs Accepted**: Performance cost of backdrop-filter, may not age well  
-**Status**: ✅ Performance acceptable, positive visual impact
-
-### Color Palette Selection
-**Date**: June 13, 2025  
-**Decision**: Cyan/magenta gradient with neural-themed colors  
-**Rationale**:
-- High contrast for accessibility
-- Futuristic feel appropriate for neural theme
-- Good visibility on various screen types
-- Distinctive brand identity
-- Works in both light and dark environments
-
-**Alternatives Considered**: Green/blue matrix theme, warm orange/red, monochrome  
-**Trade-offs Accepted**: May be too "sci-fi" for some players  
-**Status**: ✅ Good accessibility, positive feedback
-
-### Particle Effects Implementation
-**Date**: June 13, 2025  
-**Decision**: DOM-based particles for connection feedback  
-**Rationale**:
-- Simpler implementation than Canvas particles
-- Good performance for small numbers
-- CSS animations provide smooth effects
-- Easy to modify and customize
-- Adequate for current scope
-
-**Alternatives Considered**: Canvas-based particles, no particle effects  
-**Trade-offs Accepted**: Limited scalability, potential DOM pollution  
-**Status**: ✅ Good performance, consider Canvas particles for complex effects
-
-## Performance & Technical Decisions
-
-### Target Frame Rate Strategy
-**Date**: June 13, 2025  
-**Decision**: 60fps desktop, 30fps+ mobile targets  
-**Rationale**:
-- Smooth gameplay experience on primary platforms
-- Realistic given hardware constraints
-- Allows for visual effects without compromise
-- Industry standard for web games
-- Performance budget management
-
-**Alternatives Considered**: Fixed 30fps, adaptive frame rate  
-**Trade-offs Accepted**: More complex optimization needed  
-**Status**: ✅ Targets achieved on test devices
-
-### Object Pooling Strategy
-**Date**: June 13, 2025  
-**Decision**: Implement object pooling for particles  
-**Rationale**:
-- Prevents garbage collection hitches
-- Better memory management
-- Consistent performance during effects
-- Standard practice for game development
-- Scalable for future features
-
-**Alternatives Considered**: Create/destroy on demand, pre-allocate fixed arrays  
-**Trade-offs Accepted**: Additional code complexity  
-**Status**: ✅ Smooth performance improvements observed
-
-### Cross-Platform Input Handling
-**Date**: June 13, 2025  
-**Decision**: Unified mouse/touch event system  
-**Rationale**:
-- Single codebase for all platforms
-- Consistent behavior across devices
-- Easier maintenance and testing
-- Future-proof for new input methods
-- Industry best practice
-
-**Alternatives Considered**: Separate mouse/touch handlers, input library  
-**Trade-offs Accepted**: Some platform-specific optimizations lost  
-**Status**: ✅ Working well across all test devices
-
-## Deployment & Distribution Decisions
-
-### GitHub Pages Hosting
-**Date**: June 13, 2025  
-**Decision**: Use GitHub Pages for primary deployment  
-**Rationale**:
-- Free and reliable hosting
-- Automatic deployment from repository
-- Good performance with CDN
-- Easy domain setup if needed
-- Integration with development workflow
-
-**Alternatives Considered**: Netlify, Vercel, custom hosting  
-**Trade-offs Accepted**: Limited server-side capabilities  
-**Status**: ✅ Working perfectly, fast loading times
-
-### Open Source License
-**Date**: June 13, 2025  
-**Decision**: MIT License for both game and documentation  
-**Rationale**:
-- Permissive licensing encourages use
-- Educational value for other developers
-- Simple and well-understood terms
-- Allows commercial adaptation
-- Standard for web development projects
-
-**Alternatives Considered**: GPL, Apache, proprietary  
-**Trade-offs Accepted**: No commercial protection  
-**Status**: ✅ Appropriate for project goals
-
-## Development Workflow Decisions
-
-### Dual Repository Strategy
-**Date**: June 13, 2025  
-**Decision**: Separate repos for game and Claude Project documentation  
-**Rationale**:
-- Clean separation of concerns
-- Game repo focuses on product
-- Documentation repo demonstrates methodology
-- Different audiences for each repository
-- Professional presentation
-
-**Alternatives Considered**: Single repository, multiple branches  
-**Trade-offs Accepted**: Additional maintenance overhead  
-**Status**: ✅ Clear organization, positive feedback
-
-### Claude Project Integration
-**Date**: June 13, 2025  
-**Decision**: Use Claude Projects for persistent development context  
-**Rationale**:
-- Maintains context across sessions
-- Systematic knowledge accumulation
-- Consistent development approach
-- Documented decision making
-- Efficient AI collaboration
-
-**Alternatives Considered**: Regular chat sessions, external documentation  
-**Trade-offs Accepted**: Learning curve for new methodology  
-**Status**: ✅ Significant productivity improvements
-
-## Future Decision Points
-
-### Audio System Implementation (Pending)
-**Decision Needed**: Web Audio API vs HTML5 Audio elements  
-**Considerations**: Performance, browser compatibility, feature requirements  
-**Timeline**: Phase 1 development  
-**Research Status**: Investigating options
-
-### Save System Architecture (Pending)
-**Decision Needed**: LocalStorage vs IndexedDB vs Cloud storage  
-**Considerations**: Data size, offline capability, sync requirements  
-**Timeline**: Phase 1 development  
-**Research Status**: LocalStorage preferred for MVP
-
-### Framework Migration (Future)
-**Decision Needed**: When to migrate from vanilla JS to framework  
-**Considerations**: Code complexity, team size, maintenance burden  
-**Timeline**: If codebase exceeds 2000 lines or team grows  
-**Research Status**: Monitor codebase growth
-
-### Mobile App Distribution (Future)
-**Decision Needed**: PWA vs Native app stores vs Hybrid approach  
-**Considerations**: Distribution channels, native features, development cost  
-**Timeline**: Phase 3 development  
-**Research Status**: PWA seems most appropriate
-
-## Decision Review Process
-
-### Monthly Review
-- Assess whether past decisions are still valid
-- Identify new decision points from development experience
-- Update trade-off assessments based on real usage
-- Plan upcoming decisions and research needed
-
-### Decision Reversal Protocol
-1. Document why original decision no longer optimal
-2. Research alternatives with current constraints
-3. Assess migration cost and timeline
-4. Make new decision with full context
-5. Update this log with reversal rationale
-
-### Success Metrics for Decisions
-- **Technical**: Performance targets met, no major refactoring needed
-- **Process**: Development velocity maintained or improved
-- **User**: Positive feedback, engagement metrics healthy
-- **Business**: Goals achieved within time/resource constraints
+**Impact:** Enables rapid prototyping and simple deployment  
+**Status:** Current
 
 ---
 
-**This log should be updated after every major decision. Regular review helps ensure decisions remain optimal as the project evolves.**
\ No newline at end of file
+### Decision 002: Vanilla JavaScript Over Frameworks
+**Date:** June 13, 2025  
+**Context:** Technology stack selection for game engine  
+**Decision:** Use vanilla ES6+ JavaScript without external frameworks  
+**Rationale:**
+- Maximum performance control
+- No external dependencies to manage
+- Smaller bundle size
+- Educational value for learning web technologies
+
+**Alternatives Considered:**
+- React for component structure
+- Vue.js for simpler framework approach
+- Game-specific frameworks like Phaser
+
+**Impact:** Requires more manual implementation but provides full control  
+**Status:** Current
+
+---
+
+### Decision 003: Canvas 2D for Game Rendering
+**Date:** June 13, 2025  
+**Context:** Graphics rendering technology choice  
+**Decision:** HTML5 Canvas 2D API for all game graphics  
+**Rationale:**
+- Excellent performance for 2D graphics
+- Full control over rendering pipeline
+- Wide browser compatibility
+- Sufficient features for puzzle game needs
+
+**Alternatives Considered:**
+- WebGL for hardware acceleration
+- DOM manipulation for game elements
+- SVG for vector graphics
+
+**Impact:** Enables 60fps performance with fine-grained control  
+**Status:** Current
+
+---
+
+### Decision 004: Glassmorphism UI Design
+**Date:** June 13, 2025  
+**Context:** Visual design direction for user interface  
+**Decision:** Modern glassmorphism design with blur effects  
+**Rationale:**
+- Contemporary, premium appearance
+- Fits neural network technological theme
+- Creates visual depth without overwhelming gameplay
+- Differentiates from basic web games
+
+**Alternatives Considered:**
+- Flat material design
+- Skeuomorphic interface
+- Minimalist approach
+
+**Impact:** Defines entire visual language and CSS architecture  
+**Status:** Current
+
+---
+
+### Decision 005: Progressive Difficulty Algorithm
+**Date:** June 13, 2025  
+**Context:** Game balance and player engagement strategy  
+**Decision:** Algorithmic difficulty scaling based on level progression  
+**Rationale:**
+- Maintains challenge as players improve
+- Prevents frustration through gradual increase
+- Allows fine-tuning based on player data
+- Infinite content generation capability
+
+**Implementation:**
+```javascript
+const nodeCount = Math.min(5 + Math.floor(level * 0.7), 12);
+const timeLimit = Math.max(45, 60 - Math.floor(level / 3) * 2);
+```
+
+**Alternatives Considered:**
+- Fixed difficulty levels
+- Player-selected difficulty
+- Adaptive difficulty based on performance
+
+**Impact:** Core to long-term player engagement and retention  
+**Status:** Current
+
+---
+
+### Decision 006: Mobile-First Responsive Design
+**Date:** June 13, 2025  
+**Context:** Cross-platform compatibility requirements  
+**Decision:** Design primarily for mobile, enhance for desktop  
+**Rationale:**
+- Puzzle games popular on mobile devices
+- Touch interaction naturally translates to mouse
+- Ensures excellent mobile experience
+- Larger touch targets benefit accessibility
+
+**Implementation Approach:**
+- Base styles for mobile (320px+)
+- Progressive enhancement for larger screens
+- Touch target minimum 44px
+- Gesture-based interactions
+
+**Alternatives Considered:**
+- Desktop-first with mobile adaptation
+- Separate mobile and desktop versions
+- Mobile-only approach
+
+**Impact:** Influences all UI design and interaction patterns  
+**Status:** Current
+
+---
+
+### Decision 007: GitHub-Based Dual Repository Structure
+**Date:** June 13, 2025  
+**Context:** Project organization and documentation strategy  
+**Decision:** Separate repositories for game code and Claude Project methodology  
+**Rationale:**
+- Clean separation of concerns
+- Game repository showcases development skills
+- Claude Project repository demonstrates systematic approach
+- Both serve as templates for future projects
+
+**Repository Structure:**
+- `neural-nexus-game`: Game code and development documentation
+- `neural-nexus-claude-project`: Claude Project workflow and methodology
+
+**Alternatives Considered:**
+- Single repository with folders
+- Multiple repositories for different aspects
+- Documentation-only repository
+
+**Impact:** Creates reusable development methodology and clean portfolio pieces  
+**Status:** Current
+
+---
+
+### Decision 008: Session-Based Development Workflow
+**Date:** June 13, 2025  
+**Context:** Claude Project context management and knowledge retention  
+**Decision:** Structured session start/end workflow with mandatory consolidation  
+**Rationale:**
+- Prevents context loss between sessions
+- Captures decisions and rationale systematically
+- Builds knowledge base incrementally
+- Maintains development momentum
+
+**Workflow Components:**
+- Session start prompt for context setting
+- Mandatory session end consolidation
+- Weekly progress reviews
+- Stage transition assessments
+
+**Alternatives Considered:**
+- Ad-hoc development without structure
+- Daily summary instead of session-based
+- Automated context capture
+
+**Impact:** Ensures consistent progress and knowledge retention  
+**Status:** Current
+
+---
+
+## Decision Review Process
+
+### Monthly Reviews
+- Assess whether decisions are achieving intended goals
+- Identify decisions that may need modification
+- Document lessons learned from implementation
+- Plan updates based on new information or changing requirements
+
+### Decision Modification Process
+1. Document current status and why change is needed
+2. Analyze impact on existing implementation
+3. Consider alternatives within current constraints
+4. Plan implementation strategy
+5. Update related documentation
+6. Communicate changes to team/stakeholders
+
+### Decision Success Metrics
+- **Technical Decisions**: Performance targets, maintainability, scalability
+- **Design Decisions**: User satisfaction, engagement metrics, accessibility
+- **Process Decisions**: Development velocity, knowledge retention, team efficiency
+
+## Future Decisions to Track
+
+### Upcoming Decision Points
+- Audio system implementation approach
+- Save game data structure and storage method
+- Tutorial system design and implementation
+- Achievement system architecture
+- Level editor technical approach
+
+### Decision Templates
+
+#### Technical Decision Template
+```markdown
+### Decision XXX: [Title]
+**Date:** [Date]
+**Context:** [Situation requiring decision]
+**Decision:** [What was chosen]
+**Rationale:** [Why this choice]
+**Alternatives:** [Other options considered]
+**Implementation:** [How it will be built]
+**Impact:** [Effects on project]
+**Success Metrics:** [How to measure success]
+**Status:** [Current/Modified/Superseded]
+```
+
+#### Design Decision Template
+```markdown
+### Decision XXX: [Title]
+**Date:** [Date]
+**Context:** [Design challenge or requirement]
+**Decision:** [Design direction chosen]
+**User Impact:** [How this affects player experience]
+**Rationale:** [Why this approach]
+**Design Alternatives:** [Other approaches considered]
+**Implementation:** [How to achieve this design]
+**Success Metrics:** [User satisfaction, engagement measures]
+**Status:** [Current/Modified/Superseded]
+```
+
+## Knowledge Extraction
+
+### Patterns for Future Projects
+- Single-file architecture works well for simple games
+- Vanilla JavaScript provides excellent performance control
+- Mobile-first design ensures broad compatibility
+- Structured development workflow prevents context loss
+- Documentation-driven development improves long-term maintenance
+
+### Anti-Patterns Identified
+- Premature optimization before core mechanics proven
+- Complex architecture before understanding requirements
+- Neglecting mobile experience in favor of desktop polish
+- Inconsistent development practices leading to context loss
+
+Last Updated: June 2025  
+Next Review: July 2025 (Monthly decision review)
\ No newline at end of file