Add comprehensive best practices guide for Claude Projects development workflow
This commit is contained in:
339
workflow/best-practices.md
Normal file
339
workflow/best-practices.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,339 @@
|
||||
# Best Practices for Claude Projects Development
|
||||
|
||||
## Core Principles
|
||||
|
||||
### The Golden Rules
|
||||
1. **Never skip session wrap-ups** - 5 minutes of consolidation saves hours of context rebuilding
|
||||
2. **Consolidate before you forget** - Document decisions while they're fresh in memory
|
||||
3. **Trust the system** - Consistency in workflow compounds benefits over time
|
||||
4. **Stage transitions are checkpoints** - Don't rush between development phases
|
||||
|
||||
### Documentation Discipline
|
||||
- **Immediate Documentation**: Update docs as decisions are made, not later
|
||||
- **Decision Rationale**: Always record why choices were made, not just what
|
||||
- **Pattern Recognition**: Document successful approaches for reuse
|
||||
- **Context Preservation**: Maintain enough detail for seamless session continuation
|
||||
|
||||
## Workflow Best Practices
|
||||
|
||||
### Daily Session Management
|
||||
|
||||
#### Session Startup (2 minutes)
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
**Efficient Session Start:**
|
||||
1. Review last session's wrap-up notes
|
||||
2. Check current sprint priorities
|
||||
3. Identify any blockers or dependencies
|
||||
4. Set clear session objective
|
||||
5. Use session-start prompt for context refresh
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
#### During Development (Continuous)
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
**Productive Development Habits:**
|
||||
- Test changes immediately on multiple devices
|
||||
- Document architectural decisions as they're made
|
||||
- Commit working code frequently with clear messages
|
||||
- Monitor performance impact of new features
|
||||
- Update knowledge base with discovered patterns
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
#### Session Closure (5 minutes - CRITICAL)
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
**Never-Skip Session End:**
|
||||
1. Use session-end prompt template (always)
|
||||
2. Document key decisions and rationale
|
||||
3. Set clear next session priority
|
||||
4. Assess project health honestly
|
||||
5. Update knowledge base with new patterns
|
||||
6. Commit all changes with descriptive messages
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Knowledge Base Hygiene
|
||||
|
||||
#### Content Organization
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
**Effective Knowledge Structure:**
|
||||
- game-design/ - Mechanics, progression, user experience
|
||||
- technical/ - Performance, architecture, cross-platform notes
|
||||
- development/ - Roadmap, decisions, session logs
|
||||
- Limit total size to <10MB for optimal Claude Project performance
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
#### Content Quality Standards
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
**High-Quality Documentation:**
|
||||
- Decision Format: Date, Context, Choice, Rationale, Trade-offs, Status
|
||||
- Pattern Format: Problem, Solution, Code Example, When to Use, Variations
|
||||
- Process Format: Objective, Steps, Success Criteria, Common Issues
|
||||
- Always include working code examples, not just descriptions
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
#### Maintenance Routine
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
**Weekly Knowledge Base Care:**
|
||||
- Archive outdated information
|
||||
- Update status of pending decisions
|
||||
- Add new patterns discovered during development
|
||||
- Reorganize content for better accessibility
|
||||
- Ensure cross-references remain accurate
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Code Quality Practices
|
||||
|
||||
### Architecture Consistency
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
// Example: Consistent naming and structure
|
||||
class GameEntity {
|
||||
constructor(config = {}) {
|
||||
// Always provide defaults and validate inputs
|
||||
this.id = config.id || generateUniqueId();
|
||||
this.position = { x: config.x || 0, y: config.y || 0 };
|
||||
this.state = config.state || 'inactive';
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
update(deltaTime) {
|
||||
// Consistent update pattern across all entities
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
draw(context) {
|
||||
// Consistent rendering approach
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
destroy() {
|
||||
// Always implement cleanup
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Performance-First Development
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
// Example: Performance-conscious patterns
|
||||
class PerformanceOptimizedRenderer {
|
||||
constructor() {
|
||||
this.dirtyRegions = [];
|
||||
this.frameRequest = null;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
markDirty(region) {
|
||||
// Only redraw what changed
|
||||
this.dirtyRegions.push(region);
|
||||
if (!this.frameRequest) {
|
||||
this.frameRequest = requestAnimationFrame(() => this.render());
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
render() {
|
||||
// Batch operations for efficiency
|
||||
this.dirtyRegions.forEach(region => this.redrawRegion(region));
|
||||
this.dirtyRegions.length = 0;
|
||||
this.frameRequest = null;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Error Handling Standards
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
// Example: Robust error handling
|
||||
async function robustGameOperation(operation) {
|
||||
try {
|
||||
const result = await operation();
|
||||
return { success: true, data: result };
|
||||
} catch (error) {
|
||||
// Log error with context
|
||||
console.error('Game operation failed:', {
|
||||
operation: operation.name,
|
||||
error: error.message,
|
||||
stack: error.stack,
|
||||
timestamp: new Date().toISOString()
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
// Graceful degradation
|
||||
return { success: false, error: error.message };
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Testing and Quality Assurance
|
||||
|
||||
### Multi-Platform Testing
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
**Essential Testing Routine:**
|
||||
- Desktop: Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge (all major platforms)
|
||||
- Mobile: iOS Safari 14+, Android Chrome 90+
|
||||
- Performance: 60fps desktop, 30fps+ mobile
|
||||
- Compatibility: Test after every significant change
|
||||
- User Experience: Regular testing with unfamiliar users
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Performance Monitoring
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
// Example: Built-in performance monitoring
|
||||
class PerformanceMonitor {
|
||||
constructor() {
|
||||
this.metrics = {
|
||||
frameTime: [],
|
||||
memoryUsage: [],
|
||||
inputLatency: []
|
||||
};
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
trackFrame(frameTime) {
|
||||
this.metrics.frameTime.push(frameTime);
|
||||
if (this.metrics.frameTime.length > 60) {
|
||||
this.metrics.frameTime.shift();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Alert on performance issues
|
||||
const avgFrameTime = this.getAverageFrameTime();
|
||||
if (avgFrameTime > 16.67) { // Below 60fps
|
||||
this.reportPerformanceIssue('frame_rate', avgFrameTime);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Project Management Best Practices
|
||||
|
||||
### Stage Transition Management
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
**Successful Stage Transitions:**
|
||||
1. Complete current stage success criteria fully
|
||||
2. Run comprehensive stage transition assessment
|
||||
3. Document lessons learned and carry-forward items
|
||||
4. Update project configuration for new stage
|
||||
5. Migrate knowledge base appropriately
|
||||
6. Test context continuity in new stage setup
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Risk Management
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
**Proactive Risk Mitigation:**
|
||||
- Technical Risk: Regular architecture reviews, performance monitoring
|
||||
- Process Risk: Consistent workflow discipline, documentation hygiene
|
||||
- Context Risk: Never skip consolidation, maintain decision history
|
||||
- Quality Risk: Continuous testing, user feedback integration
|
||||
- Scope Risk: Regular priority assessment, feature scope management
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Stakeholder Communication
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
**Effective Progress Communication:**
|
||||
- Weekly Status: Use weekly review template output
|
||||
- Milestone Reports: Include metrics, demos, next steps
|
||||
- Issue Escalation: Provide context, impact assessment, proposed solutions
|
||||
- Success Celebration: Share achievements and lessons learned
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Common Pitfalls and How to Avoid Them
|
||||
|
||||
### Context Loss Prevention
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
**Danger Signs:**
|
||||
- Repeating previous explanations to Claude
|
||||
- Contradicting earlier architectural decisions
|
||||
- Unclear about current project priorities
|
||||
- Difficulty continuing from previous session
|
||||
|
||||
**Prevention:**
|
||||
- Never skip session end consolidation
|
||||
- Maintain decision history with rationale
|
||||
- Regular knowledge base updates
|
||||
- Use stage transition templates properly
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Technical Debt Management
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
**Early Warning Signs:**
|
||||
- Development velocity decreasing
|
||||
- Bug frequency increasing
|
||||
- Code changes requiring extensive refactoring
|
||||
- Team avoiding certain code areas
|
||||
|
||||
**Management Strategy:**
|
||||
- Allocate 20% time to debt reduction
|
||||
- Regular code quality assessments
|
||||
- Refactoring as part of feature work
|
||||
- Documentation of architectural patterns
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Performance Degradation Prevention
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
**Monitoring Strategy:**
|
||||
- Continuous performance tracking
|
||||
- Automated alerts for regressions
|
||||
- Regular cross-platform testing
|
||||
- User experience feedback loops
|
||||
|
||||
**Response Protocol:**
|
||||
- Immediate investigation of performance alerts
|
||||
- Root cause analysis with profiling tools
|
||||
- Systematic optimization with measurement
|
||||
- Prevention measures for future occurrences
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Success Patterns
|
||||
|
||||
### High-Velocity Development
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
**Characteristics of Successful Projects:**
|
||||
- Consistent daily workflow with session consolidation
|
||||
- Clear documentation of decisions and patterns
|
||||
- Regular testing across all target platforms
|
||||
- Proactive technical debt management
|
||||
- Strong communication and progress tracking
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Quality Maintenance
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
**Sustainable Quality Practices:**
|
||||
- Code review for all changes
|
||||
- Performance testing as part of development
|
||||
- User experience testing with real users
|
||||
- Documentation updated with code changes
|
||||
- Regular architecture and security reviews
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Team Collaboration
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
**Effective Team Practices:**
|
||||
- Shared understanding of architecture and patterns
|
||||
- Consistent development workflow across team members
|
||||
- Clear ownership and responsibility assignment
|
||||
- Regular knowledge sharing and cross-training
|
||||
- Collective ownership of code quality and documentation
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Continuous Improvement
|
||||
|
||||
### Feedback Loops
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
**Regular Assessment Questions:**
|
||||
- What's working well in our current workflow?
|
||||
- Where are we experiencing friction or inefficiency?
|
||||
- What patterns are we repeating successfully?
|
||||
- What mistakes are we making repeatedly?
|
||||
- How can we improve our development velocity?
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Process Evolution
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
**Iterative Improvement Approach:**
|
||||
- Monthly workflow retrospectives
|
||||
- Quarterly architecture reviews
|
||||
- Regular user feedback integration
|
||||
- Technology and tool evaluation
|
||||
- Best practice sharing and adoption
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Learning Culture
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
**Fostering Continuous Learning:**
|
||||
- Document lessons learned from each project phase
|
||||
- Share successful patterns across projects
|
||||
- Learn from failures and near-misses
|
||||
- Stay current with technology and industry trends
|
||||
- Invest in skill development and training
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Remember: These best practices are guidelines, not rigid rules. Adapt them to your specific project needs and team context while maintaining the core principles of consistency, quality, and continuous improvement.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user