Add comprehensive best practices guide for Claude Projects development workflow

2025-06-13 09:58:59 +02:00
parent 4071e960b9
commit 1dd2e5ab2f
1 changed files with 339 additions and 0 deletions
--- a/workflow/best-practices.md
+++ b/workflow/best-practices.md
@@ -0,0 +1,339 @@
 # Best Practices for Claude Projects Development
 ## Core Principles
 ### The Golden Rules
 1. **Never skip session wrap-ups** - 5 minutes of consolidation saves hours of context rebuilding
 2. **Consolidate before you forget** - Document decisions while they're fresh in memory
 3. **Trust the system** - Consistency in workflow compounds benefits over time
 4. **Stage transitions are checkpoints** - Don't rush between development phases
 ### Documentation Discipline
 - **Immediate Documentation**: Update docs as decisions are made, not later
 - **Decision Rationale**: Always record why choices were made, not just what
 - **Pattern Recognition**: Document successful approaches for reuse
 - **Context Preservation**: Maintain enough detail for seamless session continuation
 ## Workflow Best Practices
 ### Daily Session Management
 #### Session Startup (2 minutes)
 ```markdown
 **Efficient Session Start:**
 1. Review last session's wrap-up notes
 2. Check current sprint priorities
 3. Identify any blockers or dependencies
 4. Set clear session objective
 5. Use session-start prompt for context refresh
 ```
 #### During Development (Continuous)
 ```markdown
 **Productive Development Habits:**
 - Test changes immediately on multiple devices
 - Document architectural decisions as they're made
 - Commit working code frequently with clear messages
 - Monitor performance impact of new features
 - Update knowledge base with discovered patterns
 ```
 #### Session Closure (5 minutes - CRITICAL)
 ```markdown
 **Never-Skip Session End:**
 1. Use session-end prompt template (always)
 2. Document key decisions and rationale
 3. Set clear next session priority
 4. Assess project health honestly
 5. Update knowledge base with new patterns
 6. Commit all changes with descriptive messages
 ```
 ### Knowledge Base Hygiene
 #### Content Organization
 ```markdown
 **Effective Knowledge Structure:**
 - game-design/ - Mechanics, progression, user experience
 - technical/ - Performance, architecture, cross-platform notes
 - development/ - Roadmap, decisions, session logs
 - Limit total size to <10MB for optimal Claude Project performance
 ```
 #### Content Quality Standards
 ```markdown
 **High-Quality Documentation:**
 - Decision Format: Date, Context, Choice, Rationale, Trade-offs, Status
 - Pattern Format: Problem, Solution, Code Example, When to Use, Variations
 - Process Format: Objective, Steps, Success Criteria, Common Issues
 - Always include working code examples, not just descriptions
 ```
 #### Maintenance Routine
 ```markdown
 **Weekly Knowledge Base Care:**
 - Archive outdated information
 - Update status of pending decisions
 - Add new patterns discovered during development
 - Reorganize content for better accessibility
 - Ensure cross-references remain accurate
 ```
 ## Code Quality Practices
 ### Architecture Consistency
 ```javascript
 // Example: Consistent naming and structure
 class GameEntity {
  constructor(config = {}) {
    // Always provide defaults and validate inputs
    this.id = config.id || generateUniqueId();
    this.position = { x: config.x || 0, y: config.y || 0 };
    this.state = config.state || 'inactive';
  }
  update(deltaTime) {
    // Consistent update pattern across all entities
  }
  draw(context) {
    // Consistent rendering approach
  }
  destroy() {
    // Always implement cleanup
  }
 }
 ```
 ### Performance-First Development
 ```javascript
 // Example: Performance-conscious patterns
 class PerformanceOptimizedRenderer {
  constructor() {
    this.dirtyRegions = [];
    this.frameRequest = null;
  }
  markDirty(region) {
    // Only redraw what changed
    this.dirtyRegions.push(region);
    if (!this.frameRequest) {
      this.frameRequest = requestAnimationFrame(() => this.render());
    }
  }
  render() {
    // Batch operations for efficiency
    this.dirtyRegions.forEach(region => this.redrawRegion(region));
    this.dirtyRegions.length = 0;
    this.frameRequest = null;
  }
 }
 ```
 ### Error Handling Standards
 ```javascript
 // Example: Robust error handling
 async function robustGameOperation(operation) {
  try {
    const result = await operation();
    return { success: true, data: result };
  } catch (error) {
    // Log error with context
    console.error('Game operation failed:', {
      operation: operation.name,
      error: error.message,
      stack: error.stack,
      timestamp: new Date().toISOString()
    });
    // Graceful degradation
    return { success: false, error: error.message };
  }
 }
 ```
 ## Testing and Quality Assurance
 ### Multi-Platform Testing
 ```markdown
 **Essential Testing Routine:**
 - Desktop: Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge (all major platforms)
 - Mobile: iOS Safari 14+, Android Chrome 90+
 - Performance: 60fps desktop, 30fps+ mobile
 - Compatibility: Test after every significant change
 - User Experience: Regular testing with unfamiliar users
 ```
 ### Performance Monitoring
 ```javascript
 // Example: Built-in performance monitoring
 class PerformanceMonitor {
  constructor() {
    this.metrics = {
      frameTime: [],
      memoryUsage: [],
      inputLatency: []
    };
  }
  trackFrame(frameTime) {
    this.metrics.frameTime.push(frameTime);
    if (this.metrics.frameTime.length > 60) {
      this.metrics.frameTime.shift();
    }
    // Alert on performance issues
    const avgFrameTime = this.getAverageFrameTime();
    if (avgFrameTime > 16.67) { // Below 60fps
      this.reportPerformanceIssue('frame_rate', avgFrameTime);
    }
  }
 }
 ```
 ## Project Management Best Practices
 ### Stage Transition Management
 ```markdown
 **Successful Stage Transitions:**
 1. Complete current stage success criteria fully
 2. Run comprehensive stage transition assessment
 3. Document lessons learned and carry-forward items
 4. Update project configuration for new stage
 5. Migrate knowledge base appropriately
 6. Test context continuity in new stage setup
 ```
 ### Risk Management
 ```markdown
 **Proactive Risk Mitigation:**
 - Technical Risk: Regular architecture reviews, performance monitoring
 - Process Risk: Consistent workflow discipline, documentation hygiene
 - Context Risk: Never skip consolidation, maintain decision history
 - Quality Risk: Continuous testing, user feedback integration
 - Scope Risk: Regular priority assessment, feature scope management
 ```
 ### Stakeholder Communication
 ```markdown
 **Effective Progress Communication:**
 - Weekly Status: Use weekly review template output
 - Milestone Reports: Include metrics, demos, next steps
 - Issue Escalation: Provide context, impact assessment, proposed solutions
 - Success Celebration: Share achievements and lessons learned
 ```
 ## Common Pitfalls and How to Avoid Them
 ### Context Loss Prevention
 ```markdown
 **Danger Signs:**
 - Repeating previous explanations to Claude
 - Contradicting earlier architectural decisions
 - Unclear about current project priorities
 - Difficulty continuing from previous session
 **Prevention:**
 - Never skip session end consolidation
 - Maintain decision history with rationale
 - Regular knowledge base updates
 - Use stage transition templates properly
 ```
 ### Technical Debt Management
 ```markdown
 **Early Warning Signs:**
 - Development velocity decreasing
 - Bug frequency increasing
 - Code changes requiring extensive refactoring
 - Team avoiding certain code areas
 **Management Strategy:**
 - Allocate 20% time to debt reduction
 - Regular code quality assessments
 - Refactoring as part of feature work
 - Documentation of architectural patterns
 ```
 ### Performance Degradation Prevention
 ```markdown
 **Monitoring Strategy:**
 - Continuous performance tracking
 - Automated alerts for regressions
 - Regular cross-platform testing
 - User experience feedback loops
 **Response Protocol:**
 - Immediate investigation of performance alerts
 - Root cause analysis with profiling tools
 - Systematic optimization with measurement
 - Prevention measures for future occurrences
 ```
 ## Success Patterns
 ### High-Velocity Development
 ```markdown
 **Characteristics of Successful Projects:**
 - Consistent daily workflow with session consolidation
 - Clear documentation of decisions and patterns
 - Regular testing across all target platforms
 - Proactive technical debt management
 - Strong communication and progress tracking
 ```
 ### Quality Maintenance
 ```markdown
 **Sustainable Quality Practices:**
 - Code review for all changes
 - Performance testing as part of development
 - User experience testing with real users
 - Documentation updated with code changes
 - Regular architecture and security reviews
 ```
 ### Team Collaboration
 ```markdown
 **Effective Team Practices:**
 - Shared understanding of architecture and patterns
 - Consistent development workflow across team members
 - Clear ownership and responsibility assignment
 - Regular knowledge sharing and cross-training
 - Collective ownership of code quality and documentation
 ```
 ## Continuous Improvement
 ### Feedback Loops
 ```markdown
 **Regular Assessment Questions:**
 - What's working well in our current workflow?
 - Where are we experiencing friction or inefficiency?
 - What patterns are we repeating successfully?
 - What mistakes are we making repeatedly?
 - How can we improve our development velocity?
 ```
 ### Process Evolution
 ```markdown
 **Iterative Improvement Approach:**
 - Monthly workflow retrospectives
 - Quarterly architecture reviews
 - Regular user feedback integration
 - Technology and tool evaluation
 - Best practice sharing and adoption
 ```
 ### Learning Culture
 ```markdown
 **Fostering Continuous Learning:**
 - Document lessons learned from each project phase
 - Share successful patterns across projects
 - Learn from failures and near-misses
 - Stay current with technology and industry trends
 - Invest in skill development and training
 ```
 Remember: These best practices are guidelines, not rigid rules. Adapt them to your specific project needs and team context while maintaining the core principles of consistency, quality, and continuous improvement.