275 lines
12 KiB
Markdown
275 lines
12 KiB
Markdown
# Emergency Recovery Procedures
|
|
|
|
## Context Loss Recovery
|
|
|
|
### When to Use
|
|
- Claude loses track of current project state
|
|
- Conversation context becomes unclear
|
|
- Previous decisions seem forgotten
|
|
- Development momentum stalls due to confusion
|
|
|
|
### Emergency Context Recovery Protocol
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
# Emergency Context Recovery
|
|
|
|
I've lost context about this Neural Nexus project's current state. Please help me reconstruct our situation:
|
|
|
|
## 🔍 CONVERSATION ANALYSIS
|
|
**Recent History Review:**
|
|
- Analyze the last 10-15 conversation exchanges in this project
|
|
- Identify what we were working on most recently
|
|
- Extract any recent technical decisions or changes made
|
|
- Note any blockers, issues, or priorities mentioned
|
|
- Determine current development stage (Exploration/Prototype/Development/Production)
|
|
|
|
## 📋 PROJECT STATE RECONSTRUCTION
|
|
**Current Development Status:**
|
|
- What stage are we in and what are the success criteria?
|
|
- What's our current sprint or focus area?
|
|
- What features are completed vs in-progress vs planned?
|
|
- What's our established technology stack and architecture approach?
|
|
- What performance targets and constraints are we working within?
|
|
|
|
**Recent Technical Decisions:**
|
|
- What architectural choices have we made recently?
|
|
- Are there any new patterns or approaches we've adopted?
|
|
- What trade-offs have we accepted in recent sessions?
|
|
- Any specific implementation details or constraints to remember?
|
|
|
|
## 📚 KNOWLEDGE BASE ASSESSMENT
|
|
**Documentation Gaps:**
|
|
- What important information isn't documented that should be?
|
|
- Are there recent decisions that need to be captured in our knowledge base?
|
|
- What patterns or learnings should be added for future reference?
|
|
- Any outdated information that needs updating?
|
|
|
|
## 🎯 IMMEDIATE NEXT STEPS
|
|
**Priority Clarification:**
|
|
- What should be our immediate focus for this session?
|
|
- Are there any urgent blockers or issues to address?
|
|
- What's the most important task to complete next?
|
|
- Any time-sensitive decisions or deadlines approaching?
|
|
|
|
## 📝 RECOMMENDED UPDATES
|
|
**Project Configuration Updates:**
|
|
- Does our project description need updating based on current reality?
|
|
- Should our custom instructions be revised for current stage?
|
|
- What knowledge base files need immediate attention or updates?
|
|
- Any templates or workflows that need refinement?
|
|
|
|
Provide a comprehensive reconstruction to get us back on track efficiently.
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Post-Recovery Actions
|
|
1. **Immediate Documentation**: Update knowledge base with recovered context
|
|
2. **Decision Logging**: Record any clarified or rediscovered decisions
|
|
3. **Workflow Adjustment**: Refine processes to prevent future context loss
|
|
4. **Knowledge Base Cleanup**: Remove outdated or conflicting information
|
|
|
|
## Performance Degradation Recovery
|
|
|
|
### When to Use
|
|
- Game running significantly slower than target frame rates
|
|
- Memory usage increasing over time or exceeding limits
|
|
- User experience degraded compared to previous versions
|
|
- Performance issues blocking further development
|
|
|
|
### Performance Recovery Protocol
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
# Performance Degradation Analysis and Recovery
|
|
|
|
Neural Nexus performance has degraded below our targets. Please help identify and resolve performance issues:
|
|
|
|
## 📊 PERFORMANCE BASELINE ESTABLISHMENT
|
|
**Historical Performance Review:**
|
|
- What were our original performance targets for desktop and mobile?
|
|
- What benchmarks did we establish in earlier development stages?
|
|
- When did we last measure performance comprehensively?
|
|
- What were our best-ever performance metrics and under what conditions?
|
|
|
|
**Current Performance Reality:**
|
|
- What are our current measured performance metrics across target devices?
|
|
- Where specifically are we seeing degradation (frame rate, memory, load time)?
|
|
- How severe is the performance impact on actual user experience?
|
|
- Are there specific features, levels, or operations that are particularly slow?
|
|
|
|
## 🔍 DEGRADATION ANALYSIS
|
|
**Timeline Investigation:**
|
|
- When did performance degradation begin (gradual vs sudden)?
|
|
- What changes, features, or code modifications coincided with performance decline?
|
|
- Can we identify specific commits, features, or decisions that impacted performance?
|
|
- Are there external factors (browser updates, device changes) affecting results?
|
|
|
|
**Root Cause Investigation:**
|
|
- Analyze database query performance and optimization opportunities
|
|
- Review frontend bundle size, loading performance, and asset optimization
|
|
- Examine API response times, bottlenecks, and potential caching improvements
|
|
- Investigate memory usage patterns and potential leaks or inefficient allocation
|
|
- Assess network request efficiency, caching effectiveness, and CDN performance
|
|
|
|
## 🎯 PERFORMANCE RECOVERY PLAN
|
|
**Quick Wins (Can implement immediately):**
|
|
1. [Optimization] - [Expected impact] - [Implementation time]
|
|
2. [Optimization] - [Expected impact] - [Implementation time]
|
|
|
|
**Short-term Improvements (Next 1-2 weeks):**
|
|
1. [Optimization] - [Expected impact] - [Implementation effort]
|
|
2. [Optimization] - [Expected impact] - [Implementation effort]
|
|
|
|
**Long-term Performance Strategy (Next month+):**
|
|
1. [Optimization] - [Expected impact] - [Implementation effort]
|
|
2. [Optimization] - [Expected impact] - [Implementation effort]
|
|
|
|
## 📈 MONITORING AND PREVENTION
|
|
**Performance Monitoring Setup:**
|
|
- What metrics should we track continuously to detect future regressions?
|
|
- How can we establish automated alerts for performance degradation?
|
|
- What benchmarking process should be part of our regular development workflow?
|
|
|
|
**Development Process Improvements:**
|
|
- How can we catch performance issues during development before they reach users?
|
|
- What performance testing should be mandatory before deploying changes?
|
|
- How can we make performance considerations a standard part of code review?
|
|
|
|
## 📝 DOCUMENTATION UPDATES
|
|
**Performance Documentation:**
|
|
- Update performance targets and benchmarks based on current capabilities
|
|
- Document optimization techniques that work specifically for our technology stack
|
|
- Create performance troubleshooting guides for common issues and solutions
|
|
|
|
Provide a specific, measurable plan to restore performance and maintain it going forward.
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Technical Debt Crisis Recovery
|
|
|
|
### When to Use
|
|
- Development velocity significantly slowed by accumulated technical debt
|
|
- Code quality degraded to point where adding features is extremely difficult
|
|
- Bug frequency increased due to complex, unmaintainable code
|
|
- Team morale suffering due to frustrating development experience
|
|
|
|
### Technical Debt Crisis Protocol
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
# Technical Debt Crisis Management and Recovery
|
|
|
|
Technical debt in Neural Nexus has accumulated to the point where it's significantly impacting our development velocity and code quality. Please help assess and manage this debt systematically:
|
|
|
|
## 📊 DEBT ASSESSMENT AND CATALOGING
|
|
**Comprehensive Debt Inventory:**
|
|
- Identify all areas of significant technical debt in our codebase by category
|
|
- Categorize debt by type: code quality, architecture, security, performance, documentation, testing
|
|
- Assess the age and growth rate of each debt item over our development timeline
|
|
- Estimate the current impact of each debt area on development velocity and system reliability
|
|
|
|
**Debt Impact Analysis:**
|
|
- How is current technical debt blocking or significantly slowing new feature development?
|
|
- What features, improvements, or optimizations are we unable to implement due to existing debt?
|
|
- How is accumulated debt affecting code reliability, bug rates, and system stability?
|
|
- What's the risk assessment of debt causing system failures, security vulnerabilities, or user experience problems?
|
|
|
|
## ⚖️ DEBT PRIORITIZATION MATRIX
|
|
**Critical Debt (Immediate Action Required - This Sprint):**
|
|
- [Debt item] - [Impact: High/Med/Low] - [Effort: High/Med/Low] - [Risk if ignored: Critical/High/Med]
|
|
- [Debt item] - [Impact: High/Med/Low] - [Effort: High/Med/Low] - [Risk if ignored: Critical/High/Med]
|
|
|
|
**High-Priority Debt (Address Within 2-4 Weeks):**
|
|
- [Debt item] - [Impact: High/Med/Low] - [Effort: High/Med/Low] - [Business justification]
|
|
- [Debt item] - [Impact: High/Med/Low] - [Effort: High/Med/Low] - [Business justification]
|
|
|
|
**Manageable Debt (Plan for Future Sprints):**
|
|
- [Debt item] - [Impact: High/Med/Low] - [Effort: High/Med/Low] - [Timeline to address]
|
|
- [Debt item] - [Impact: High/Med/Low] - [Effort: High/Med/Low] - [Timeline to address]
|
|
|
|
## 🚀 DEBT REDUCTION STRATEGY
|
|
**Emergency Debt Sprint (Immediate - 1 week):**
|
|
- Focus exclusively on critical debt that's completely blocking progress
|
|
- Implement quick wins that provide immediate relief to development workflow
|
|
- Apply minimum viable fixes to restore basic development velocity and system stability
|
|
|
|
**Systematic Debt Reduction (2-4 weeks):**
|
|
- Address high-priority debt systematically using dedicated sprint capacity
|
|
- Implement preventive measures and development practices to avoid creating new debt
|
|
- Establish ongoing debt monitoring, limits, and regular assessment processes
|
|
|
|
**Long-term Debt Management (Ongoing Process):**
|
|
- Implement regular debt assessment and reduction cycles as part of development workflow
|
|
- Establish team practices and development standards that minimize debt creation
|
|
- Create sustainable balance between feature development and debt management activities
|
|
|
|
## 🛡️ DEBT PREVENTION MEASURES
|
|
**Development Process Improvements:**
|
|
- Implement code review practices specifically designed to catch and prevent debt early
|
|
- Establish "Definition of Done" criteria that includes debt considerations and quality gates
|
|
- Schedule regular architecture reviews, refactoring time, and technical improvement cycles
|
|
|
|
**Technical Practices and Standards:**
|
|
- Implement automated testing frameworks to prevent regression debt and maintain code quality
|
|
- Establish documentation requirements and standards for new features and architectural changes
|
|
- Define and enforce performance, security, and maintainability standards for all new code
|
|
|
|
## 📈 PROGRESS TRACKING AND ACCOUNTABILITY
|
|
**Debt Metrics and Monitoring:**
|
|
- How will we measure technical debt reduction progress objectively?
|
|
- What early warning indicators should we monitor to prevent debt accumulation?
|
|
- How will we track and maintain the balance between feature development and debt management?
|
|
|
|
**Success Criteria and Milestones:**
|
|
- Define specific, measurable goals for debt reduction with clear timelines
|
|
- Establish project milestones and checkpoints to assess progress and adjust strategy
|
|
- Identify clear success criteria for when we've successfully managed the debt crisis
|
|
|
|
Provide a concrete, time-bound plan to systematically reduce technical debt while maintaining development momentum and preventing future debt accumulation.
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Post-Recovery Actions
|
|
1. **Process Integration**: Make debt prevention part of regular workflow
|
|
2. **Team Training**: Ensure everyone understands debt prevention practices
|
|
3. **Monitoring Setup**: Implement ongoing debt tracking and alerts
|
|
4. **Regular Reviews**: Schedule periodic debt assessment sessions
|
|
|
|
## Best Practices for Emergency Prevention
|
|
|
|
### Proactive Measures
|
|
1. **Regular Health Checks**: Weekly project health assessments
|
|
2. **Documentation Discipline**: Update docs immediately when making decisions
|
|
3. **Decision Tracking**: Maintain clear decision history with rationale
|
|
4. **Context Preservation**: Never skip session end consolidation
|
|
5. **Performance Monitoring**: Continuous performance tracking and alerting
|
|
|
|
### Early Warning Systems
|
|
```javascript
|
|
// Emergency warning indicators to watch for
|
|
const emergencyIndicators = {
|
|
contextLoss: [
|
|
'Repeating previously answered questions',
|
|
'Contradicting earlier decisions',
|
|
'Unclear about current project state',
|
|
'Asking for information already provided'
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
performanceDrift: [
|
|
'Frame rate below targets consistently',
|
|
'Memory usage trending upward',
|
|
'User complaints about responsiveness',
|
|
'Load times increasing over time'
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
technicalDebt: [
|
|
'Feature development velocity slowing',
|
|
'Bug frequency increasing',
|
|
'Code changes requiring extensive refactoring',
|
|
'Team avoiding certain areas of codebase'
|
|
]
|
|
};
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Recovery Success Metrics
|
|
- **Context Recovery**: Clear understanding of current state and priorities
|
|
- **Performance Recovery**: Metrics back within target ranges
|
|
- **Debt Recovery**: Development velocity restored, bug frequency reduced
|
|
- **Process Improvement**: Prevention measures implemented and working
|
|
|
|
Remember: Emergency recovery is about getting back on track quickly, not perfect solutions. Focus on immediate restoration first, then systematic improvement. |